Skip to main content
. 2019 May 10;110(1-2):83–91. doi: 10.1159/000500862

Table 1.

Baseline clinical and pathological characteristics of the 138 patients with advanced PanNET treated with TEM or TEM-CAP

TEM (n = 38) TEM-CAP (n = 100) p value
Male gender, n (%) 19 (50) 58 (58) 0.40
Age, years 59.5±11.6 57.0±12.1 0.53
Hormonal syndrome, n (%) 12 (31.6) 15 (15.0) 0.03
  Gastrinoma 5 8
  Insulinoma 1 3
  Glucagonoma 4 3
  VIPoma 1 0
  Parathyroid hormone-related protein 1 0
  Calcitonin 0 1
Ki-67 index, %a 7.8±6.2 11.0±10.3 0.16
Tumor grade, n (%)a 0.17
  G1 6 (15.8) 12 (12.5)
  G2 31 (81.6) 71 (74)
  G3 1 (2.6) 13 (13.5)
WHO performance status, n (%) 0.51
  0 22 (57.9) 65 (65)
  1 14 (36.8) 33 (33)
  2 2 (5.3) 2 (2)
Tumor stage, n (%) 0.83
  Locally advanced 1 (2.6) 3 (3)
  Liver metastases only 22 (57.9) 52 (52)
  Extrahepatic metastases 15 (39.5) 45 (45)
Progression within 12 months, n (%) 33/35 (94.3) 69/70 (98.6) 0.26
3 nonevaluable 30 nonevaluable
Delay to diagnosis, months 58.7±49.6 29.9±35.7 0.001
Previous treatments, n (%)
  Primary tumor surgery 21 (55.3) 51 (51) 0.65
  Chemotherapy 16 (42.1) 22 (22) 0.02
  Targeted therapy 10 (26.3) 14 (14) 0.09
  Liver transarterial (chemo-)embolization 7 (18.4) 8 (8) 0.12
  Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy 2 (5.3) 1 (1) 0.18
  Somatostatin analog treatment 19 (50.0) 29 (29) 0.02
Previous lines, n <0.001
  0 9 (23.7) 58 (58)
  ≥1 29 (76.3) 42 (42)

Values are presented as n (%) or mean ± SD. Bold type denotes significance. PanNET, pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor; TEM, temozolomide; CAP, capecitabine. * 4 missing values.