Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 17;9:1563. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.01563

Table 3.

Some relevant advantages and disadvantages of current and prospective FLASH radiotherapy sources (color coded by radiation modality).

Radiation source Modality of radiation Advantages (+) Disadvantages (–) Currently available for FLASH-RT clinical studies, with which main limitations?
Conventional electron linear accelerator (10, 14, 66, 67) 1–25 MeV Electrons Inexpensive.
Minor beam size limitation.
Poor depth penetration.
Wide penumbra.
Yes, Limited to treating superficial tumors.
Very High Energy Electron linear accelerator (68, 69) or Laser plasma accelerators (70, 71) 100–250 MeV Electrons Good depth penetration.
Electromagnetic steering and focusing.
Not sensitive to tissue heterogeneity.
Low pulse rate (1–10 Hz) for Laser plasma accelerators.
Limited beam size.
No
Laser plasma accelerators (75) 1–45 MeV Protons Compact design possible.
Electromagnetic steering possible.
Poor depth penetration.
Low pulse rate (1–10 Hz).
Very sensitive to tissue. heterogeneity.
Higher LET in Bragg peak.
Beam contamination.
Stability issues.
Limited beam size.
No
Cyclotrons, synchrotrons or Synchrocyclotron (11, 76) 100–250 MeV Protons Good depth penetration.
Electromagnetic steering possible.
Limited dose-bath. Electromagnetic steering.
Large expensive sources.
Sensitive to tissue heterogeneity.
Higher LET in Bragg peak.
Beam scanning or scattering required to cover target volumes
Yes,
FLASH effect might be lost with beam scanning and/or higher LET.
X-ray tube (72) 50–250 keV X-rays Inexpensive.
Compact design.
Very limited depth penetration.
Limited beam size.
High entrance dose.
Yes,
Limited to treating small and very superficial tumors.
Synchrotron (24, 32) 50–600 keV X-rays Microbeam Radiation Therapy possible. Very large.
Very expensive.
Limited depth penetration.
Very limited availability.
Limited beam size requires scanning of sample/target.
Yes,
Very limited availability.
Electron linear accelerator with high density target (20) 6–10 MV X-rays Good depth penetration.
Narrow penumbra.
Minor beam size limitation.
Multiple beam angles required. No