Skip to main content
Canadian Journal of Public Health = Revue Canadienne de Santé Publique logoLink to Canadian Journal of Public Health = Revue Canadienne de Santé Publique
. 1999 Sep 1;90(5):316–319. doi: 10.1007/BF03404519

Regional Patterns of Infant Mortality Caused by Lethal Congenital Anomalies

Shi Wu Wen 19,, Shiliang Liu 19, K S Joseph 19, Konia Trouton 19, Alexander Allen 29
PMCID: PMC6979681  PMID: 10570575

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the regional patterns of infant mortality due to lethal congenital anomalies, and the potential reasons for the regional patterns.

Method: The study analyzed 2,507 infant deaths due to lethal congenital anomalies among 1,178,452 live births in 9 of the 12 Canadian provinces and territories from 1990 to 1995 recorded in Statistics Canada’s live birth and death data bases.

Results: Compared with the province of Quebec, congenital anomaly-attributed infant mortality was higher in Newfoundland, Saskatchewan, and Alberta. These differences in infant mortality were substantial for cardiovascular system anomalies and especially anen-cephaly. For infant mortality due to chromosomal anomalies, however, there was little interprovincial variation.

Conclusions: Despite substantial recent reductions in lethal congenital anomaly-attributed infant mortality, there remain major regional variations in infant mortality caused by certain forms of congenital anomalies including anen-cephaly and cardiovascular system anomalies.

References

  • 1.Wen SW, Liu S, Joseph KS, et al. Patterns of infant mortality caused by lethal congenital anomalies. (Submitted for publication.) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 2.Goldenberg RL, Humphrey JL, Hale CB, Wayne JB. Lethal congenital anomalies as a cause of birth-weight-specific neonatal mortality. JAMA. 1983;250:513–15. doi: 10.1001/jama.1983.03340040053032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.CDC Contribution of birth defects to infant mortality — United States, 1986. MMWR. 1989;38:633–35. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Joseph KS, Kramer MS. Recent trends in Canadian infant mortality rates: The effect of changes in registration of live newborns weighing less than 500 g. CMAJ. 1996;155:1047–52. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Joseph KS, Kramer MS. Recent trends in infant mortality rates and proportions of low-birth-weight live births in Canada. CMAJ. 1997;157:535–41. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ericson A, Kallen B, Winberg J. Surveillance of malformations at birth: A comparison of two record systems run in parallel. Int J Epidemiol. 1977;6:35–41. doi: 10.1093/ije/6.1.35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kalter H, Warkany J. Congenital malformations: Etiologic factors and their role in prevention. N Engl J Med. 1983;308:424–31. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198302243080804. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.MRC Vitamin Study Research Group. Prevention of neural tube defects: Results of the Medical Research Council Vitamin Study. Lancet. 1991;338:131–37. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(91)90133-A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Czeizel AE, Dudas I. Prevention of the first occurrence of neural-tube defects by periconcep-tional vitamin supplementation. N Engl J Med. 1992;327:1832–35. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199212243272602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Czeizel AE. Prevention of congenital abnormalities by periconceptional multivitamin supplementation. Br Med J. 1993;306:1645–48. doi: 10.1136/bmj.306.6893.1645. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Mulinare J, Cordero JF, Erickson JD, Berry RJ. Periconceptional use of multivitamins and the occurrence of neural tube defects. JAMA. 1988;260:3141–45. doi: 10.1001/jama.1988.03410210053035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Yang Q, Khoury MJ, Olney RS, Mulinare J. Does periconceptional multivitamin use reduce the risk of limb deficiency in offspring? Epidemiology. 1997;8:157–61. doi: 10.1097/00001648-199703000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Li DK, Daling JR, Mueller BA, et al. Periconceptional multivitamin use in relation to the risk of congenital urinary tract anomalies. Epidemiology. 1995;6:212–18. doi: 10.1097/00001648-199505000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Cragan JD, Roberts HE, Edmonds LD, et al. Surveillance for anencephaly and spina bifida and the impact of prenatal diagnosis — United States, 1985–1994. MMWR. 1995;44(Supplement4):1–13. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.EUROCAT Working Group. Prevalence of neural tube defects in 20 regions of Europe and the impact of prenatal diagnosis, 1980–1986. J Epidemiol Commun Health. 1991;45:52–58. doi: 10.1136/jech.45.1.52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.CDC Economic burden of spina bifida — United States, 1980–1990. MMWR. 1989;38:264–67. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Morris CD, Menashe VD. 25-year mortality after surgical repair of congenital heart defect in childhood. A population-based cohort study. JAMA. 1991;266:3447–52. doi: 10.1001/jama.1991.03470240069035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Grupe WE. The dilemma of intrauterine diagnosis of congenital renal disease. Pediatr Clin North Am. 1987;34:629–38. doi: 10.1016/S0031-3955(16)36259-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Chervenak FA, Berkowitz RL, Tortora M, et al. The management of fetal hydrocephalus. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1985;151:933–42. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(85)90672-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Ling EW, Sosuan LC, Hall JC. Congenital anomalies: An increasingly important cause of mortality and workload in a neonatal intensive care unit. Am J Perinatology. 1991;8:164–69. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-999369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Canadian Journal of Public Health = Revue Canadienne de Santé Publique are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES