Résumé
Cet article a pour objectif de montrer comment l’utilisation d’un modèle en cours de planification d’un programme en promotion de la santé appuie le travail des profes-sionnelles. Prenant appui sur l’évaluation d’implantation d’un logiciel d’aide à la programmation, il développe une métaphore illustrant l’utilisation du modèle PRECEDE-PROCEED. l’analyse a rendu intelligible quatre fonctionnalités du modèle: direction, coordination, articulation et transmission. L’examen de ces fonctionnalités met en évidence l’action structurante du modèle sur l’effort de planification. Dans une démarche future, il serait intéressant d’approfondir ces quatre fonctionnalités, avec ou sans l’aide du logiciel, d’explorer d’autres modèles de planification en promotion de la santé dans leur contexte naturel d’utilisation, et de voir dans quelle mesure ces mêmes fonction-nalités ou d’autres fonctionnalités sont alors mises à contribution.
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to present results which illustrate the role of the PRECEDE-PROCEED model in the program planning process. Based on the results of an implementation evaluation of the EMPOWER software which supports health programming efforts, we have developed a metaphore to illustrate the use of the model. The following four functions of the model were identified: direction, coordination, articulation and transmission. Analysis of these functions demonstrated the structuring action of the model on planning. It would be interesting to further study how these four functions operate with or without the support of the software, to explore the influence of other health promotion models in their natural settings and to see in which way the same or other functions might be identified.
Bibliographie
- 1.McLeroy KR, Steckler AB, Simons-Morton B, et al. Social science theory in health education: Time for a new model? Health Educ Res. 1993;8:305–12. doi: 10.1093/her/8.3.313-s. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Hochbaum GM, Lorig K (Eds). Roles and uses of theory in health education practice. Health Educ Q 1992;19:291–403. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 3.Green LW, Glanz K, Hotchbaum GM, et al. Can we build on, or must we replace theories and models in health education? Health Educ Res. 1994;9:397–404. doi: 10.1093/her/9.3.397. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Kok G, Green LW. Research to support health promotion in practice: A plea for increased cooperation. Health Prom Int. 1996;5:303–8. doi: 10.1093/heapro/5.4.303. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Dean K. Using theory to guide policy relevant health promotion research. Health Prom Int. 1996;19:19–26. doi: 10.1093/heapro/11.1.19. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Dean K, McQueen D. Theory in health promotion: Introduction. Health Prom Int. 1996;11:7–9. doi: 10.1093/heapro/11.1.7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Nutbeam D. Improving the fit between research and practice in health promotion: Overcoming structural barriers. Can J Public Health. 1996;87(suppl.2):S18–S23. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Service C, Salver EJ. Community Health Education: The Lay Advisor Approach. 1979. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Steckler AB, Orville K, Eng E, Dawson L. Patching It Together: A Formative Evaluation of CDC’s Planned Approach to Community Health (PATCH) Program. 1989. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Minkler M. Health education, health promotion and the open society: An historical perspective. Health Educ Q. 1989;16:17–30. doi: 10.1177/109019818901600105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Green LW, Kreuter MW. Health Promotion Planning: An Educational and Environmental Approach. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield Publishing; 1991. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Rossi PH, Freeman HE. Evaluation. 4th Edition. Newbury Park, CA: Sage; 1989. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Marshall C, Rossman G. Designing Qualitative Research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage; 1989. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Strauss A, Corbin J, editors. Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory, Procedures and Techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage; 1990. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Huberman AM, Miles MB. Analyse des données qualitatives: Recueil de nouvelles méthodes. Belgique: De Boeck-Wesmael; 1993. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Haudricourt A-G. La technologie, science humaine. Recherches d’histoire et d’ethnologies des techniques. Paris: Édition des sciences de l’homme Paris; 1987. [Google Scholar]