Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychol Trauma. 2019 Jul 18;12(4):422–430. doi: 10.1037/tra0000485

Table 2.

Logistic regressions predicting acceptance into the ITP and attendance among accepted veterans.

Acceptance into ITP Attendance among accepted
Predictor OR (95% CT) p OR (95% CI) p
Marital Status
 Single (reference) -- --
 Separated/Divorced 1.19(0.79–1.79) .403 2.98(1.37–6.45) .006*
 Partnered/Married 0.83 (0.52–1.32) .425 1.76(0.94–3.29) .079
Employment Status
 Out of work (reference) -- --
 Employed 1.48(0.96–2.28) .075 0.58(0.32–1.06) .075
 Retired 0.64(0.30–1.37) .250 1.51(0.31–7.26) .606
 Student 1.12(0.53–2.36) .770 0.35(0.12–1.04) .059
Age 1.00(0.98–1.02) .893 1.04(1.00–1.08) .056

Note: OR represents Odds Ratio for acceptance or attendance based on demographic factor. Acceptance into ITP: 0 = not accepted; 1 = accepted. Attendance among accepted: 0 = did not attend; 1 = attended. Marital status ‘widowed’ and employment status ‘no response’ were excluded due to low numbers across all groups.

*

represents p < .05. No significant differences were found between non-reference categories for marital or employment status in either analysis.