Table 9.
Comparison of the performance of different multi-modal classification algorithms
Algorithms | Subjects | Modalities | AD vs NC | MCI vs NC | MCI-C vs MCI-NC | Algorithm Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MKL (Zhang et al., 2011) | 51AD, 43MCI-C, 56MCI-NC, 52NC | MRI + PET +CSF | 93.20 | 76.40 | -- | The classical multi-kernel learning (MKL) based algorithm |
MTL (Jie et al., 2015) | 51AD, 43MCI-C, 56MCI-NC, 52NC | MRI + PET +CSF | 95.03 | 79.27 | 68.94 | The multi-task learning (MTL) based algorithm |
M-RBM (Suk et al., 2014) | 93AD, 76MCI-C, 128 MCI-NC, 101 NC | MRI + PET | 95.35 | 85.67 | 75.92 | The pioneering multi-modal deep RBM (M-RBM) based feature learning algorithms |
SAE (Liu et al., 2015b) | 85AD, 67MCI-C, 102 MCI-NC, 77 NC | MRI + PET | 91.35 | 90.42 | -- | The SAE-based multi-modal neuroimaging feature learning algorithm |
SAE-MKL (Suk, 2013) | 51AD, 43MCI-C, 56MCI-NC, 52NC | MRI + PET +CSF | 98.80 | 90.70 | 83.30 | The combination of SAE-based feature learning and MKL classification (SAE-MKL) algorithm |
DW-S2MTL (Suk et al., 2016) | 51AD, 43MCI-C, 56MCI-NC, 52NC | MRI + PET +CSF | 95.09 | 78.77 | 73.04 | The deep sparse multi-task learning based feature selection (DW-S2MTL) algorithm |
Dropout-DL (Li et al., 2015) | 51AD, 43MCI-C, 56MCI-NC, 52NC | MRI + PET +CSF | 91.40 | 77.40 | 70.10 | The dropout based robust multi-task deep learning (Dropout-DL) algorithm |
SDSAE (Shi et al., 2017) | 94AD, 121MCI, 123NC | Longitudinal MRI | 91.95 | 83.72 | -- | The SDSAE-based feature learning algorithm |
NGF (Tong et al., 2017) | 37AD, 75MCI, 35NC | MRI + PET +CSF + Genetics | 98.10 | 82.40 | 77.90 | The nonlinear graph fusion (NGF) based algorithm |
MM-SDPN-SVM (Shi et al., 2018) | 51AD, 43MCI-C, 56MCI-NC, 52NC | MRI + PET | 97.13 | 87.24 | 78.88 | The multi-modal stacked deep polynomial networks and SVM |