Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Tob Control. 2019 Jul 18;29(Suppl 2):s62–s71. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2019-054984

Table 3.

Associations between flavor preferences, harm perceptions, and use of flavored WPT during preconception and pregnancy (N = 58).

Menthol/Mint Fruit

Predictor IRR (95% CI) P IRR (95% CI) P
Age 0.98 (0.90, 1.07) .723 1.08 (0.97, 1.20) .152
Latina Ethnicitya 4.01 (1.88, 8.54) <.001 0.74 (0.28, 1.97) .546
Flavor Preferences 1.77 (1.39, 2.25) <.001 1.96 (1.20, 3.19) .007
Flavor Perceptions
   General Harm 0.90 (0.67, 1.22) .505 1.17 (0.85, 1.62) .346
   Fetal Harm 0.95 (0.73, 1.26) .740 0.83 (0.58, 1.19) .312
Dual/Poly WPT Useb 0.25 (0.12, 0.52) <.001 1.09 (0.40, 2.93) .872

Note. WPT=Waterpipe Tobacco. Negative binomial regression with robust variance estimation was used for all count variables (menthol/mint and fruit-flavored WPT events over preconception and 1st trimester). Age, preferences, and perceptions (general harm, fetus) are continuous variables; ethnicity (1 = Latina; 0 = non-Latina) and use status (1=dual/poly WPT user; 0=WPT-only user) were dummy coded. IRR = incidence rate ratio; CI = confidence interval.

a

Reference category is non-Latina (0).

b

Reference category is WPT-only users (0).

Overdispersion parameter: α =1.84 (95% CI = 1.27 to 2.66)

Overdispersion parameter: α =2.70 (95% CI = 1.57 to 4.64)