Table 3.
Associations between flavor preferences, harm perceptions, and use of flavored WPT during preconception and pregnancy (N = 58).
| Menthol/Mint† | Fruit‡ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Predictor | IRR (95% CI) | P | IRR (95% CI) | P |
| Age | 0.98 (0.90, 1.07) | .723 | 1.08 (0.97, 1.20) | .152 |
| Latina Ethnicitya | 4.01 (1.88, 8.54) | <.001 | 0.74 (0.28, 1.97) | .546 |
| Flavor Preferences | 1.77 (1.39, 2.25) | <.001 | 1.96 (1.20, 3.19) | .007 |
| Flavor Perceptions | ||||
| General Harm | 0.90 (0.67, 1.22) | .505 | 1.17 (0.85, 1.62) | .346 |
| Fetal Harm | 0.95 (0.73, 1.26) | .740 | 0.83 (0.58, 1.19) | .312 |
| Dual/Poly WPT Useb | 0.25 (0.12, 0.52) | <.001 | 1.09 (0.40, 2.93) | .872 |
Note. WPT=Waterpipe Tobacco. Negative binomial regression with robust variance estimation was used for all count variables (menthol/mint and fruit-flavored WPT events over preconception and 1st trimester). Age, preferences, and perceptions (general harm, fetus) are continuous variables; ethnicity (1 = Latina; 0 = non-Latina) and use status (1=dual/poly WPT user; 0=WPT-only user) were dummy coded. IRR = incidence rate ratio; CI = confidence interval.
Reference category is non-Latina (0).
Reference category is WPT-only users (0).
Overdispersion parameter: α =1.84 (95% CI = 1.27 to 2.66)
Overdispersion parameter: α =2.70 (95% CI = 1.57 to 4.64)