Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 24;15(1):e0226817. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226817

Table 4.

Cq <35
% (N)
<35 vs 35–38
p-value
Cq = 35–38
% (N)
35–38 vs 38–40
p-value
Cq = 38–40
% (N)
38–40 vs >40
p-value
Laboratory markers
CRP 50 (12) 0.08 29 (17) 0.74 36 (5) 0.34
WCC 25 (6) 1.00 27 (16) 0.16 7 (1) 0.30
Clinical signs
≥1 sign 88 (21) 0.005 54 (32) 0.37 71 (10) 1
≥2 signs 75 (18) 0.02 46 (27) 1.00 43 (6) 0.27
≥3 signs 60 (14) 0.05 32(19) 1.00 29 (4) 0.56
≥ 4 signs 42 (10) 0.19 25 (15) 1.00 21 (3) 1.00
≥ 5 signs 38 (9) 0.009 10 (6) 0.64 14 (2) 1.00
≥ 6 signs 13 (3) 0.35 5 (3) 0.24 14 (2) 0.35

Correlation between clinical signs / laboratory markers and PCR results. This table shows the percentage (number) of infants with samples in each Cq range and number of clinical signs (1 to 6) as well as percentage (number) of infants with abnormal laboratory markers and the p-values as calculated by two-tailed Fisher’s exact test.