Table 1.
Descriptive Statistics of Analytic Sample (N=487)
| Treatment Condition |
Significant Group Differencesa. | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parent and Youth (PY) |
Parent Only (PO) |
Comparison (C) |
|||||
| M (%) | SD | M (%) | SD | M (%) | SD | ||
| Inhalant Use | |||||||
| Inhalant frequency (w1) | 1.11 | 0.53 | 1.11 | 0.60 | 1.06 | 0.31 | |
| Inhalant frequency (w2) | 1.03 | 0.22 | 1.23 | 0.88 | 1.09 | 0.48 | PY < PO* |
| Anti-Drug Norms (w1) | |||||||
| Personal Disapproval of Substance Use | 3.81 | 0.51 | 3.60 | 0.85 | 3.78 | 0.51 | PY, C > PO* |
| Peer Disapproval of Substance Use | 4.26 | 1.04 | 4.32 | 0.94 | 4.32 | 0.91 | |
| Parental Disapproval of Substance Use | 3.70 | 0.82 | 3.63 | 0.87 | 3.71 | 0.75 | |
| Control Variables (w1) | |||||||
| Usual grades in school | 3.12 | 1.60 | 3.05 | 1.41 | 3.08 | 1.40 | |
| Gender-female | (45.0%) | (49.3%) | (48.6%) | ||||
| Two parent household | (71.5%) | (70.9%) | (71.5%) | ||||
| Born in the USA | (81.5%) | (78.2%) | (82.9%) | ||||
| Free lunch in school | (91.0%) | (90.0%) | (93.6%) | ||||
a.
For continuous variables, one-way ANOVA results with post hoc comparisons using Tukey HSD test indicated that the mean scores were significantly different at * p< .05, ** p<.01, or ***p<.001. For categorical variables, chi-square tests indicated that percentages were significantly different at * p< .05, ** p<.01, or ***p<.001.