Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Gynecol Oncol. 2019 Nov 24;156(1):62–69. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.11.002

Table 2:

Lymphadenectomy characteristics

Characteristic SLN Cohort (n=118) LND Cohort (n=96) P
Pelvic LND, n (%) 0.002
 No 3 (2.5%) 13 (13.5%)
 Yes 115 (97.5%) 83 (86.5%)

Number of pelvic lymph nodes removed, median (IQR)* 11 (5, 16) 30 (26, 41) <0.001

Positive pelvic lymph nodes, n (%) 0.52
 No or pelvic LND not performed 93 (78.8%) 79 (82.3%)
 Yes 25 (21.2%) 17 (17.7%)

Positive pelvic lymph nodes, n (%)* 0.83
 No 90 (78.3%) 66 (79.5%)
 Yes 25 (21.7%) 17 (20.5%)

Paraaortic LND, n (%) <0.001
 No 63 (53.4%) 18 (18.8%)
 Yes 55 (46.6%) 78 (81.3%)

Number of paraaortic lymph nodes removed, median (IQR)* 4 (2, 9) 17 (11, 23) <0.001

Positive paraaortic lymph nodes, n (%) 0.34
 No or paraaortic LND not performed 109 (92.4%) 85 (88.5%)
 Yes 9 (7.6%) 11 (11.5%)

Positive paraaortic lymph nodes, n (%)* 0.72
 No 46 (83.6%) 67 (85.9%)
 Yes 9 (16.4%) 11 (14.1%)

IQR=interquartile range, LND=lymphadenectomy.

*

Limited to patients with specified lymphadenectomy.

Comparisons between groups were evaluated using the chi-square or Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables and the Wilcoxon rank-sum test for the number of nodes.