Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroimage. 2019 Nov 9;206:116337. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116337

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

Mean and standard deviation of CBF-values in four different areas of the synthetic CBF-map for the fully sampled (Full) and accelerated approach in dependence of different numbers of C/L-pairs. Note that the standard deviation in the noise free GT is due to blurring and incorporation of GM and WM values with a probability higher than 90%. Additionally, a N of 30 corresponds to 5 C/L-pairs for the fully sampled approach due to a 6-fold lower temporal resolution.