Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 7;98(1):skz390. doi: 10.1093/jas/skz390

Table 4.

Effects of dietary BPA supplementation during lactation or gestation and lactation on reproductive sows and litter performances

Item Treatment SEM P-value4
Control L GL
No. of sows1 19 19 20
Parity, n 2.84 2.83 2.75
Sow reproductive performance
 Litter birth weight, kg 22.01 21.85 21.90 1.350 0.996
 Total born piglets, n 17.01 17.67 19.13 0.941 0.238
 Piglets born alive, n 14.47b 15.28b 17.53a 0.811 0.020
 Born alive piglet weight, kg 1.41a 1.24ab 1.16b 0.070 0.024
Litter performance
 Litter size at cross-fostering (CF), n2 14.39 14.90 14.93 0.173 0.057
 Piglet CF weight, kg 1.48 1.44 1.33 0.072 0.299
 Piglet lactation weight day 20, kg 4.94 5.04 4.70 0.247 0.585
 Piglet postweaning weight day 7, kg 5.41 5.58 5.51 0.288 0.701
Piglet weight gain from CF to day 7 postweaning, kg 3.93 4.14 4.18 0.203 0.497
Lactation length, d 23.45 22.86 23.91 0.575 0.403
Preweaning mortality rate,3 % 2.19 1.27 3.68 0.199 0.281

a,bMeans within a row with different superscripts indicate significant differences (P < 0.05).

1Data from number of sows allotted per treatment at farrowing and during lactation. Difference with the initial number of sows before breeding corresponds to sows that showed physiological issues (heat failure [gilts], repeated estrous, or abortion).

2Litter sizes were adjusted by cross-fostering within treatment between days 1 and 2 after farrowing.

3Piglets preweaning mortality rate was estimated from cross-fostering to weaning.

4Sow parity was considered as covariable for the statistical analysis.