Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 24;10:1134. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-58113-4

Table 1.

Summary of the most important results for each group.

Control Group (n = 8) PCL Group (n = 8) PLCL Group (n = 8) p-value between groups (test)
Material fibre thickness 325 ± 36 nm 2047 ± 585 nm
Material thickness 49 ± 5 nm 53 ± 6 nm
Macroscopic signs of anastomotic stenosis (count; %) 0; 0% 0; 0% 0; 0%
Macroscopic signs of anastomotic leakage (count; %) 0; 0% 0; 0% 0; 0%
Mean PAAS score per segment (0–2) (mean ± SEM across pigs)* 0.479 ± 0.086 0.823 ± 0.171 0.688 ± 0.070

0.715

(repeated measures ANOVA)

Incomplete re-epithelisation (count; %) 0; 0% 0; 0% 0; 0%
Volume fraction of vWF positive cells [%] (mean ± SEM) 2.22 ± 0.10 2.16 ± 0.16 2.38 ± 0.12 0.690 (repeated measures ANOVA)
Volume fraction of collagen fibres [%] (mean ± SEM) 15.51 ± 2.10 15.67 ± 2.36 11.87 ± 1.91 0.740 (repeated measures ANOVA)
Volume fraction of MAC387 positive cells [%]: 0.550 (two-way ANOVA)
  • stitch not in sample (n: mean ± SEM) 8: 0.38 ± 0.09 8: 0.46 ± 0.19 8: 0.21 ± 0.06
  • stitch in sample (n: mean ± SEM) 7: 0.80 ± 0.23 5: 0.67 ± 0.16 6: 0.70 ± 0.27

*Each animal was assigned a score equal to the average of all segment scores in that animal (i.e. 24 segment scores per animal; result theoretically ranging from 0 to 2). Mean and Standard error of the mean (SEM) stated in the table were then calculated from these animal averages.