Table 3.
Performance of the six groups tested in Experiment 1.
| Group | Ratio 0.60 | Ratio 0.75 | Ratio 0.86 | Ratio 0.91 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group 1 |
1151/1640 P < 0.05* |
1098/1833 P < 0.05* |
961/1765 P < 0.05* |
1160/1973 P < 0.05* |
| Group 2 |
1194/1691 P < 0.05* |
1323/2161 P < 0.05* |
1075/2028 P < 0.01* |
1158/2025 P < 0.05* |
| Group 3 |
2165/3153 P < 0.05* |
1795/3314 P < 0.05* |
1568/3070 P = 0.241 |
1570/2855 P < 0.05* |
| Group 4 |
1585/2205 P < 0.05* |
1422/2246 P < 0.05* |
1214/2542 P < 0.05* |
1326/2532 P < 0.05* |
| Group 5 |
1784/2432 P < 0.05* |
1984/3199 P < 0.05* |
1357/2439 P < 0.05* |
1980/3599 P < 0.05* |
| Group 6 |
1145/1552 P < 0.05* |
1215/1935 P < 0.05* |
854/1494 P < 0.05* |
1026/1856 P < 0.05* |
| Mean of the 6 groups |
9024/12673 P < 0.05* |
8837/14688 P < 0.05* |
7029/13338 P < 0.05* |
8220/14840 P < 0.05* |