Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 18;21(1):17. doi: 10.3390/ijms21010017

Table 2.

Genotype frequencies of complement factor D (CFD) and complement factor H (CFH) between patients with RPL and controls.

Genotypes Controls
(n = 384)
RPL Patients
(n = 412)
AOR (95% CI) * p FDR-p
CFD rs2230216 C>G
CC 306 (79.7) 317 (76.9) 1.000 (reference)
CG 72 (18.8) 93 (22.6) 1.225 (0.866–1.732) 0.252 0.397
GG 6 (1.6) 2 (0.5) 0.302 (0.060–1.513) 0.145 0.305
Dominant (CC vs. CG+GG) 1.154 (0.822–1.621) 0.408 0.643
Recessive (CC+CG vs. GG) 0.296 (0.059–1.481) 0.138 0.290
HWE-p 0.461 0.078
CFH rs1065489 G>T
GG 109 (28.4) 123 (29.9) 1.000 (reference)
GT 199 (51.8) 208 (50.5) 0.921 (0.666–1.272) 0.617 0.648
TT 76 (19.8) 81 (19.7) 0.931 (0.620–1.398) 0.731 0.768
Dominant (GG vs. GT+TT) 0.926 (0.682–1.258) 0.624 0.655
Recessive (GG+GT vs. TT) 0.983 (0.693–1.396) 0.925 0.971
HWE-p 0.387 0.680
CFH rs1061170 T>C
TT 325 (84.6) 370 (89.8) 1.000 (reference)
TC 59 (15.4) 42 (10.2) 0.625 (0.409–0.954) 0.029 0.091
CC 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) N/A N/A N/A
Dominant (TT vs. TC+CC) 0.625 (0.409–0.954) 0.029 0.091
Recessive (TT+TC vs. CC) N/A N/A N/A
HWE-p 0.103 0.276

* The odds ratio was adjusted by age. CFD, complement factor D; CFH, complement factor H; RPL, recurrent pregnancy loss; AOR, adjusted odds ratio; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval; HWE, Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium; FDR, false-positive discovery rate.