. 2020 Jan 3;17(1):335. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17010335

Table 5.

Means, standard deviations (SD), and ANOVA results between cybervictimization, gender, avoidant communication with mother, and academic competence.

	Gender	Cybervictimization
	Gender	Low	Moderate	High	F(2, 2393)	η ² _p	Post Hoc
ACM	Boy	2.87 (0.72) ^a	2.97 (0.62) ^b	2.99 (0.68) ^c	3.174 ***	0.017	^f > ^{a, d}
ACM	Girl	2.78 (0.69) ^d	2.94 (0.65) ^e	3.06 (0.66) ^f	3.174 ***	0.017	^{b, c, e} > ^d
AC	Boy	5.67 (1.82) ^a	5.64 (1.90) ^b	5.02 (2.06) ^c	3.082 ***	0.060	^d > ^{a, b, c, e, f}
AC	Girl	6.60 (1.77) ^d	6.17 (1.94) ^e	5.57 (2.04) ^f	3.082 ***	0.060	^e > ^{a, b, c, f}

Note: ACM = avoidant communication mother; AC = academic competence; ^a = boys low cybervictims; ^b = boys moderate cybervictims; ^c = boys high cybervictims; ^d = girls low cybervictims; ^e = girls moderate cybervictims; ^f = girls high cybervictims; F = Fisher–Snedecor’s F; Bonferroni test α = 0.05; η²_p = partial eta squared. The data in parentheses correspond to the standard deviations. *** p < 0.001.