Table 4.

Calculated PCB-related cancer risks due to the consumption of traditional foods in relation to social variables (village of Uelen, 2010).

Indicator	Value	Carcinogenic Risk	Noncarcinogenic Risk
Monthly household income per capita	Below living wage (RUR 11,113.5), n = 33	3.4 × 10−4 [1.6 × 10−4−7.8 × 10−4]	0.57 [0.26–1.31]
	Above living wage, n = 9	1.0 × 10−4 [0.0−3.7 × 10−4]	0.17 [0.0–0.62]
Marine mammal fat consumption	Above 10 kg/year, n = 13	4.8 × 10−4 [2.5 × 10−4−1.0 × 10−3]	0.81 [0.42–1.72]
	Below 10 kg/year, n = 29	8.8 × 10−5 [0.0− 3.5 × 10−4]	0.15 [0.0–0.58]
Alcohol consumption	Low (up to 1 L of vodka monthly), n = 17	1.2 × 10−4 [8.0 × 10−7−4.0 × 10−4]	0.19 [0.0–0.66]
	High (2 L+ bottles of vodka monthly), n = 25	3.9 × 10−4[1.9 × 10−4−8.7 × 10−-4]	0.65 [0.32–1.45]
Occupational activity, the village of Uelen (males only)	Traditional subsistence, n = 6	5.8 × 10−4[3.2 × 10−4−1.2 × 10−3]	0.97 [0.53–2.00]
	Other occupations, n = 13	1.4 × 10−4 [1.8 × 10−5−4.4 × 10−4]	0.24 [0.03–0.74]
Awareness of persistent contaminants exposure prevention	Aware, n = 38	3.8 × 10−4[1.8 × 10−4−8.5 × 10−4]	0.63 [0.30–1.41]
	Unaware, n = 4	6.7 × 10−5 [0−3.1 × 10−4]	0.11 [0–0.52]