Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 8;2020:5013142. doi: 10.1155/2020/5013142

Table 3.

Results of platform usage by interest, user category, and activity.

n (%)/mean ± SD/median (25-75 quartiles) Intervention group
(n = 95)
Control group
(n = 98)
p value/median difference score (95% CI)
Interested patienta 58 (61.1) 65 (66.3) 0.45
Platform userb 33 (34.7) 33 (33.7) 0.50
Active userc 21 (22.1) 18 (18.4) 0.45
Number of log-ons (all patients) 0 (0–1) 0 (0–1) 0.77#
Number of log-ons (only interested patients) 2 (1–7) 2 (1–5) 0.74#
Range 1–11 1–26 −0.34 (−3.28 to 2.61)
Categories 0.85
 0–1 log-ons 36 (63.2) 46 (70.8)
 2–4 log-ons 9 (15.8) 9 (13.8)
 More than 4 log-ons 12 (21.1) 10 (15.4)
Time spent per session (hh/mm) 00 : 23 ± 00 : 09 00 : 25 ± 00 : 08 0.09#
Total time spent (hh/mm) 00 : 56 (00 : 27–02 : 15) 00 : 53 (00 : 27–02 : 14) 0.93#
Range 00 : 07–09 : 02 00 : 06–09 : 34 0.90 (–50.25 to 52.05)

Pearson chi-square test. #Mann–Whitney U test. aAttended the platform training. bLogged on at least once after the training. cLogged on for at least two sessions of 5 minutes or more after the training.