Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Addict Behav. 2019 Sep 5;100:106121. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2019.106121

Table 4.

Latent Growth Curve Model Estimating the Effect of Intervention Conditions on Smoking Following Sexual Assault

Intercept
Estimate (SE)
Standardized
Estimate (SE)
Slope
Estimate (SE)
Standardized
Estimate (SE)
Unconditional Model 3.03 (0.11)****** .99 (.08)*** −0.09 (0.03)** −0.72 (0.18)
 Variance 9.41 (0.95)*** 1.0 0.02 (0.008)* 1.0
Conditional Model
 PIRI (1) vs PPRS (0) -- -- 0.07 (0.07) 0.15 (0.15)
 TAU (1) vs PPRS (0) -- -- 0.16 (0.08)* 0.35 (0.14)*
 ED SUDS 0.02 (.01)* 0.16 (0.08)* .001 (.001) −0.04 (0.13)
 Age 0.17 (0.42) 0.04 (0.08) 0.10 (0.06) 0.33 (0.21)
 Education −1.25 (0.57)* −0.19 (0.09) −0.07 (0.06) −0.18 (0.14)
 Income −2.71 (0.78)*** −0.36 (0.09)*** −0.09 (.09) −0.19 (0.15)
 Employed outside home −0.83 (0.61) −0.11 (0.08) −0.19 (0.06)** −0.41 (0.13)**

Note: PIRI vs PPRS: Pleasant Imagery and Relaxation Intervention vs Prevention of Post Rape Stress; TAU = Treatment as Usual; ED SUDS = Emergency Department (ED) Subjective Units of Distress (SUDs); --not estimated

*

p<.05

**

p<.01

***

p<.001