Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychophysiology. 2019 Sep 19;57(2):e13473. doi: 10.1111/psyp.13473

Table 2.

Descriptive statistics and Pearson correlations between PES estimates, behavior, and ERPs

PESTraditional (ms) PESRobust (ms) PESError Trial (ms) ΔPEA (%) Flanker RT (ms) Flanker Accuracy (%) ΔERN (µV) ΔPe (µV)
Mean 9.88 35.11 45.80 −2.46 64.65 19.68 −5.13 4.61
Standard Deviation 26.44 30.68 37.32 5.81 17.95 10.55 3.53 3.80

PESTraditional --
PESRobust .64** --
PESError Trial .43** .69** --
ΔPEA .10 −.21 −.17 --
Flanker RT −.03 .02 .11 .15 --
Flanker Accuracy −.34** −.28* .09 −.06 .18 --
ΔERN .05 .14 .16 .01 .03 −.04 --
ΔPe .26* .26* .04 .05 −.06 −.20 −.20 --

Note. N = 61 except for correlations with ΔPEA, where N = 60. PES: Post-error slowing; ΔPEA: Post-error accuracy minus post-correct accuracy; Flanker RT: RT on incongruent correct trials minus RT on congruent correct trials; Flanker Accuracy: accuracy on congruent trials minus accuracy on incongruent trials; ΔERN: error-related negativity minus correct response negativity; ΔPe: Pe on error minus Pe on correct trials.

*

p < .05

**

p <.01.