Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 6;25(1):223. doi: 10.3390/molecules25010223

Table 1.

Morphological parameters of the different hierarchical levels of the coconut fruit. Given are mean values ± standard deviation. From hierarchical level H3, only the endocarp was considered. Abbreviations: number (n), thin to thick ratio (t:t ratio), vascular bundles (vb), sclereid cell matrix (scm), resolution (res), tracheids (t), sclereid cells (sc), mesocarp side (ms), centre (c), testa side (ts), cell wall (cw), width to length ratio (w:l ratio), primary cell wall layer (l1), secondary cell wall layers (l2), pits (p).

Hierarchical Level Structure n Length Width Thickness Others Evaluated Data
H0 fruit 161 up to 25 [cm] 1 up to 20 [cm] 1 “ellipsoidal to broadly ovoid, indistinctly 3-angled”
[Dransfield and Cooke, 1999]
H1 “almost always 1 only, very large, with a narrow layer of homogeneous endosperm, and a large central cavity partially filled with fluid; embryo basal, opposite one of the endocarp pores” [Dransfield and Cooke, 1999]
pericarp
H2 exocarp 0.015 [mm] 2 “smooth” [Dransfield and Cooke, 1999];
“a smooth, tough coat, of a brownish or grayish color” [Winton, 1901]
mesocarp 3–4 [cm] 2 “very thick and fibrous, dry” [Dransfield and Cooke, 1999]; “consists of a hard outer coat, but a few mm thick and a soft portion usually 3–4 cm thick on the sides and much thicker on the base. Imbedded in the mesocarp are numerous longitudinally arranged fibers, varying in size from slender hairs to large […] forms, 2–3 mm broad.” [Winton, 1901]
endocarp 10 116.5 ± 9.2 [mm] 92.8 ± 5.2 [mm] thin: 2.5 ± 0.5 thick: 4.7 ± 0.6 [mm] Shell with a prolate, spheroidal shape and varying thickness digital calliper
H3-1 vb diameter: 0.22 ± 0.14 [mm] CT data (res: 42 µm) + CT Analyser
H3-2 scm porosity: 0.033 CT data (res: 42 µm) + CT Analyser
H4-1 t 424.3 ± 263.3 [µm] (n = 6) 11.5 ± 3.6 [µm] (n = 80) LM images (macerated cells) + ImageJ
H4-2 sc-ms 60 100.3 ± 21.5 [µm] 40.7 ± 9.2 [µm] w:l ratio 0.42 ± 0.10 LM images (macerated cells) + ImageJ
sc-c 60 115.6 ± 29.4 [µm] 31.3 ± 6.5 [µm] w:l ratio 0.29 ± 0.09 LM images (macerated cells) + ImageJ
sc-ts 60 125.2 ± 38.8 [µm] 25.4 ± 5.4 [µm] w:l ratio 0.22 ± 0.09 LM images (macerated cells) + ImageJ
H5-1 cw (t) 30 1.7 ± 0.4 [µm] scalariform pitting SEM images + ImageJ
H5-2 cw (sc) 30 13.8 ± 2.9 [µm] thickness in relation to cell radius 89.2 ± 4.3 [%] SEM images + ImageJ
H6-2 l1 (sc) 24 2.0 ± 0.5 [µm] 3 SEM images + ImageJ
l2 (sc) 145 253 ± 74 [nm] SEM images + ImageJ
p (sc) 414 2.5 ± 0.6 [µm] 1.8 ± 0.4 [µm] bordered, ramiform pits SEM images + ImageJ

1 data from Dransfield and Cooke [15]; 2 data from Winton [13]; 3 this value should be seen as a first order estimation and may be too high, including secondary cell wall layers and the middle lamella.