Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jan 26.
Published in final edited form as: J Psychosom Res. 2014 Jul 26;77(4):264–272. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2014.07.016

Table 4.

Causal model analyses comparing outcomes of Interpersonal Psychotherapy for Depressed Patients with Pain to Enhanced Treatment as Usual among 61 women with chronic pelvic pain and depression

Causal Models
Estimate Standard Error
Depression
Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression
Treatment group 2.1533* 1.048
Time −0.012** 0.004
Beck Depression Inventory
Treatment group 3.887* 2.186
Time −0.022** 0.007
Major Depressive Disorder Diagnosis
Treatment group 0.187* 0.098
Time −0.001 0.000
Interpersonal Function
Interpersonal Sensitivity
Treatment group 0.247* 0.144
Time −0.001* 0.001
Lack of Sociability
Treatment group −0.082 0.140
Time −0.001 0.001
Interpersonal Ambivalence
Treatment group 0.434** 0.139
Time −0.002** 0.001
Aggression
Treatment group 0.565** 0.204
Time −0.001* 0.001
Need for Social Approval
Treatment group 0.163 0.179
Time −0.001* 0.001
Pain
Pain Severity
Treatment group −0.488 0.301
Time X Treatment Group −0.001 0.002
Pain Interference
Treatment group −0.331 0.198
Time X Treatment Group −0.001 0.002

Notes.

*

p<.05 difference between treatment groups

**

p <.01 difference between treatment groups

Estimate for treatment group is interpreted as group difference; Estimate for time X treatment group is interpreted as group change over time; Reference group is the IPT-P group; All analyses controlled for age, baseline antidepressant medication use, and session attendance; social function and pain analyses also controlled for baseline Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression score; Interpersonal Function was measured on the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems; Pain was measured on the Multidimensional Pain Inventory.