Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Pancreatology. 2019 Nov 25;20(1):51–59. doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2019.11.008

Table 2.

Comparisons of candidate biomarkers among different disease groups. Listed are the biomarkers that were found to be significantly differently expressed. The AUC corresponds to the combined score formed by linear combination of the significant biomarkers.

Comparison of interest # Significantly differentially expressed biomarkers AUC (95% CI)
Controls vs. RAP vs. CP vs. PDAC 24 – RESISTIN, LEPTIN, GM-CSF, IL-1β, IFNγ, IL-31, PDGFB, IL-27, TNFα, SCF, MIP-1α, IFNβ, RANTES, IL-17F, IL-6, FASL, IP-10, IL-13, TNFβ, HGF, MIG, IL-12P40, TGFα, NGF Not Significant
Controls vs. CP vs. PDAC 11 – GM-CSF, LEPTIN, IL-31, RESISTIN, PDGFB, FASL, IFNβ, IL-17F, IL-27, TGFα, TNFβ Not Significant
Controls vs. RAP vs. CP 18 – RESISTIN, LEPTIN, GM-CSF, IL-1β, IFNγ, IL-31, PDGFB, IL-27, TNFα, SCF, MIP-1α, IFNβ, RANTES, IL-17F, IL-6, FASL, IP-10, IL-13 Not Significant
RAP vs. Controls 6 – IFN γ, IL-13, IL-1β, IL-27, IL-31, and FASL 0.77 (0.64 – 0.90)
CP vs. Controls 5 – GM-CSF, IFNβ, LEPTIN, PDGFB, and RESISTIN 0.86 (0.77 – 0.94)
PDAC vs. Controls 4 – GM-CSF, IL-31, LEPTIN, and FASL 0.77 (0.68 – 0.85)
CP vs. RAP 4 – RESISTIN, SCF, MIP-1α, and IL-17F 0.77 (0.64 – 0.90)
PDAC vs. RAP 5 – HGF, IL-12P40, MIG, SCF, and TNFα 0.77 (0.66 – 0.89)
PDAC vs. CP 3 – IFNβ, IL-17F and PDGFB 0.76 (0.67 – 0.86)
     
Disease Subgroup Analysis
Controls with DM vs. no DM 4 – IL-1α, SDF1A, RESISTIN, and VEGF 0.85 (0.72 – 0.97)
     
DM Subgroup Analysis
DM Controls vs. CP with DM vs. PDAC with DM 9 – RESISTIN, RANTES, GM-CSF, IL-31, IL-1α, PDGFB, SDF1A, FASL, and ICAM1 Not Significant
CP with DM vs. DM Controls 5 – GM-CSF, IL-1α, RANTES, RESISTIN, and SDF1A 0.90 (0.81 – 0.99)
PDAC with DM vs. DM Controls 6 – GM-CSF, IL-31, RANTES, RESISTIN, FASL, and ICAM1 0.96 (0.93 – 1.00)
PDAC with DM vs. CP with DM 1 – PDGFB 0.69 (0.56 – 0.82)