Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Hum Genet. 2019 Dec 16;139(2):199–213. doi: 10.1007/s00439-019-02098-2

Figure 2: Performance assessment of different methods with simulated data.

Figure 2:

We randomly selected two SNPs in one gene to be causal, and the effect size was c = 0.1. The estimated hertibability was about 2.5%. a, AUC comparison between different methods. b, True positive rate (Power) comparison under some specified false positive rates. c, False positive rate comparison under some specified true positive rates. The violin plot and box plot inside display the false/true positive rates of different methods under specified true/false positive rates.