Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 27;11(12):e6476. doi: 10.7759/cureus.6476

Table 2. PEM faculty responses to questions about factors that faculty employ to regulate the participation of an EM resident in patient care during rotations in a PED.

EM: emergency medicine; PGY: postgraduate year; PEM: pediatric emergency medicine; PED: pediatric emergency department

 

  Decision to see patients, n (%) Decision to allow procedures, n (%) Decision to offer autonomy, n (%)
Patient-related factors      
Patient acuity 19 (61.3)   29 (93.5)
Procedural difficulty   25 (83.3)  
Parent consent 0 (0) 3 (9.7) 1 (3.2)
Resident-related factors      
Attending assessment of the resident’s ability 22 (71.0) 28 (90.3) 30 (96.8)
Resident’s level of training (PGY) 19 (61.3) 25 (80.6) 29 (93.5)
Resident’s confidence 13 (41.9) 23 (74.2) 21 (67.7)
Resident’s personality 6 (19.4) 8 (26.7) 14 (45.2)
Resident’s program affiliation 11 (35.5) 7 (23.3) 10 (32.3)
Environmental related factors      
Presence of an EM Fellow 16 (51.6) 20 (66.7) 14 (45.2)
Conditions of the department (flow) 1 (3.2) 4 (13) 2 (6.5)
Competition between learners 0 (0) 8 (25.8) 0 (0.0)
Faculty-related factors      
How well attending faculty knows the resident 21 (67.7) 23 (74.2) 31 (100)
Resident’s education needs as determined by the faculty 3 (9.7) 3 (9.7) 0 (0.0)