| General parameters |
|
|
| Number of years |
100 |
Following Tilson et al. (1994); also see ‘Discussion’ section. |
| Time-steps |
1 year |
Following Tilson et al. (1994) and Leimgruber et al. (2008). |
| Number of iterations |
500 |
Following Tilson et al. (1994); 500–1,000 iterations are typical values in VORTEX models (Miller & Lacy (2005). |
| Extinction definition |
Only 1 sex remains |
Following Tilson et al. (1994) and Leimgruber et al. (2008), this is the standard definition of extinction in PVA analyses; two levels of quasi-extinction were also modeled, see text for further discussion. |
| Reproductive systems (polygynous) |
|
|
| Age of first offspring for females (years) |
20 |
Following Tilson et al. (1994) who argue that females tend to breed later in rainforest areas compared to the more open areas of southern India. |
| Age of first offspring for males (years) |
20 |
Following Tilson et al. (1994). |
| Maximum age of reproduction (years) |
60 |
Following Tilson et al. (1994), Sukumar (2003), and Leimgruber et al. (2008). |
| Maximum number of progeny per year |
1 |
Following Tilson et al. (1994), Sukumar (2003), and Leimgruber et al. (2008). |
| Sex ratio at birth |
1:1 |
Following Tilson et al. (1994) and Leimgruber et al. (2008). |
| Density-dependent reproduction |
No |
Following Tilson et al. (1994) and Leimgruber et al. (2008). |
| Reproductive rates |
|
|
| offspring/mature female/year |
0.18 |
Following Tilson et al. (1994) and Leimgruber et al. (2008). |
| Environmental variation in breeding |
3.20% |
Approximately 20% of the mean value following Tilson et al. (1994) and Leimgruber et al. (2008). |
| Mortality rates for females |
|
|
| 0–1 years |
15.00% |
Following Tilson et al. (1994), Sukumar (2003), and Leimgruber et al. (2008). |
| >1–5 |
4.00% |
Following Tilson et al. (1994) and Leimgruber et al. (2008). |
| >5–15 |
2.00% |
Following Tilson et al. (1994) and Leimgruber et al. (2008). |
| >15 |
2.50% |
Following Tilson et al. (1994) and Leimgruber et al. (2008). |
| Mortality rates for males |
|
|
| 0–1 |
15.00% |
Following Tilson et al. (1994), Sukumar (2003), and Leimgruber et al. (2008). |
| >1–5 |
5.00% |
Following Tilson et al. (1994) and Leimgruber et al. (2008). |
| >5–15 |
3.00% |
Following Sukumar (2003) and Leimgruber et al. (2008). |
| >15 |
3.00% |
Following Sukumar (2003) and Leimgruber et al. (2008). |
| Mate monopolization |
|
|
| Percent males in breeding pool |
80% |
Following Tilson et al. (1994) and Leimgruber et al. (2008). |
| Initial population |
|
|
| Start with age distribution |
Stable |
Following Tilson et al. (1994) and Leimgruber et al. (2008); also see Table 3
|
| Initial population size |
135 |
This study. |
| Carrying capacity |
|
|
| Carrying capacity (K) |
250 |
Calculate from area of ERL using 0.1 elephant/sq km after Sukumar (2003).
|
| SD in K due to environmental variation |
5 |
Following Leimgruber et al. (2008). |
| Trend in K? |
No |
Following Leimgruber et al. (2008) and most of the Tilson et al. (1994) scenarios; see text for further justification. |
| Inbreeding depression |
|
|
| Lethal equivalents |
3.14 |
Following Tilson et al. (1994) and Miller & Lacy (2005); the value is the mean for 40 mammalian species. |
| Percent due to recessive lethals |
50 |
Following Tilson et al. (1994) and Miller & Lacy (2005); the value is the mean for 40 mammalian species. |