Table 2.
ChicagoCHEC Fellows’ Satisfaction with Different Program Componentsa
| Cohort 2 (2017), n (%) | Cohort 3 (2018), n (%) | |
|---|---|---|
| Program overall | ||
| Very dissatisfied/somewhat dissatisfied | 1(7) | 0 |
| No opinion | 0 | 0 |
| Satisfied/very satisfied | 14 (93) | 16(100) |
| Lectures | ||
| Very dissatisfied/somewhat dissatisfied | 4(27) | 0 |
| No opinion | 0 | 0 |
| Satisfied/very satisfied | 11(73) | 16(100) |
| Learning with leaders | ||
| Very dissatisfied/somewhat dissatisfied | 3(20) | 0 |
| No opinion | 1(7) | 0 |
| Satisfied/very satisfied | 11(73) | 16(100) |
| Near peer mentorship via Gear Up | ||
| Very dissatisfied/somewhat dissatisfied | 3(20) | 0 |
| No opinion | 1(7) | 0 |
| Satisfied/very satisfied | 11(73) | 16(100) |
| Journal club | ||
| Very dissatisfied/somewhat dissatisfied | 1(7) | 0 |
| No opinion | 3(20) | 3(19) |
| Satisfied/very satisfied | 11(73) | 13 (81) |
| Site visits | ||
| Very dissatisfied/somewhat dissatisfied | 2(13) | 0 |
| No opinion | 0 | 0 |
| Satisfied/very satisfied | 13 (87) | 16(100) |
| Project group work and final project | ||
| Very dissatisfied/somewhat dissatisfied | 4(27) | 0 |
| No opinion | 0 | 2(13) |
| Satisfied/very satisfied | 11(73) | 14 (88) |
a
Total cohort 2, N = 16; total cohort 3, N = 17. In both cohorts, one student was unable to complete the postprogram evaluation survey. Senior fellows do not complete these surveys.