Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 22;2020(1):CD012196. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012196.pub2

Karba 1997.

Methods Double‐blind study
Participants People with spinal cord injuries
Interventions ES (experimental group) versus sham stimulation (control group)
Outcomes Relative healing rate (percentage per day)
Notes Not sure if randomised: awaiting response from the author of the study

ES: electrical stimulation