Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 24;8(1):2325967119895258. doi: 10.1177/2325967119895258

Table 5.

Posterior Tibial Slope Reported in the Literaturea

Author (Year) Population Knee Disorder Average Age, y Imaging Technology No. of Knees Average MPPTA, deg Average LPPTA, deg Average GPPTA, deg Tibial Reference Axis
Current study (2020) White, Asian None 58 CT 756 6.2 ± 3.7 5.3 ± 3.2 6.3 ± 2.9 Anatomic axis
Weinberg32 (2017) Cadaveric: black, white None NR 3D digitizer apparatus 1090 6.9 ± 3.7 4.7 ± 3.6 NR Center of the first third of the tibial shaft
Zhang37 (2014) Chinese None 31 CT 80 8.4 ± 3.1 7.6 ± 2.5 NR Proximal long axis, anterior cortices, posterior cortices
Mohanty23 (2013) Indian OA 62 Radiography 100 NR NR 11.6 ± 4.5 Anatomic axis
Haddad10 (2012) White, African, Asian Soft tissue injury 42 MRI 148 5.7 ± 3.8 5.6 ± 4.2 NR Tibial proximal anatomic axis
de Boer (2009)6 Cadaveric: African, white, mixed None 56 Handmade measurements 105 NR NR 8.4 ± 3.7 Tibial shaft anatomic axis
Yoo35 (2008) Korean (female) OA 67 Radiography 90 NR NR 10.6 ± 3.5 Anterior cortical line, proximal anatomic axis, central anatomic axis, posterior cortical line, fibular shaft axis
Kuwano17 (2005) Japanese OA 71 CT 50 9.0 ± 5.0 8.1 ± 4.0 NR Longitudinal axis of the tibial shaft
Chiu5 (2000) Cadaveric: Chinese Healthy/OA 68 Radiography 50 14.8 ± 4.2 11.8 ± 3.8 NR Anterior cortex

a3D, 3-dimensional; CT, computed tomography; GPPTA, global posterior plateau tibial angle; LPPTA, lateral posterior plateau tibial angle; MPPTA, medial posterior plateau tibial angle; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; NR, not reported; OA, osteoarthritis.