Summary of findings 2. Complex compared to simplified health education.
Comparison 2: complex compared to simplified health education | ||||||
Population: adolescents Setting: Australia Intervention: multi‐component health educationa Comparison: simplified health education | ||||||
Outcomes | Impact | № of participants (studies) | Certainty of the evidence (GRADE)** | |||
Absolute effects* (95% CI) | Relative effect (95% CI) | Narrative results | ||||
With simplified education | With complex health education | |||||
Uptake of hepatitis B vaccineb | 756 per 1000 | 741 per 1000 (726 to 748) | RR 0.98 (0.96 to 0.99) | A complex multi‐component health education programme probably results in little or no difference in uptake of 3 doses of hepatitis B vaccine compared to simplified health education. | 17,411 (1)c | ⊕⊕⊕⊝ Moderated |
CI: confidence interval; RR: risk ratio. *The anticipated absolute effect in the intervention group (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed likelihood of being vaccinated in the simplified health education group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI). **GRADE Working Group grades of evidence: High certainty: this research provides a very good indication of the likely effect. The likelihood that the effect will be substantially different† is low. Moderate certainty: this research provides a good indication of the likely effect. The likelihood that the effect will be substantially different† is moderate. Low certainty: this research provides some indication of the likely effect. However, the likelihood that it will be substantially different† is high. Very low certainty: this research does not provide a reliable indication of the likely effect. The likelihood that the effect will be substantially different† is very high. †Substantially different = a large enough difference that it might affect a decision. |
a Health education kit with 4‐lesson structured multi‐component intervention that included: a resource fact sheet and assessment, an information video and questions designed to engage an adolescent audience, small group discussion, and an activity to locate resource information on the Internet.
bThe lag‐time between delivery of the intervention and assessment of outcomes was not provided.
cSkinner 2000 (randomised trial). d Downgraded one level due to study limitations, as the included study has an unclear risk of bias.