Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 17;2020(1):CD011895. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011895.pub2

Summary of findings 2. Complex compared to simplified health education.

Comparison 2: complex compared to simplified health education
Population: adolescents
 Setting: Australia
 Intervention: multi‐component health educationaComparison: simplified health education
Outcomes Impact № of participants
 (studies) Certainty of the evidence
 (GRADE)**
Absolute effects* (95% CI) Relative effect
 (95% CI) Narrative results
With simplified education With complex health education
Uptake of hepatitis B vaccineb 756 per 1000 741 per 1000
 (726 to 748) RR 0.98
 (0.96 to 0.99) A complex multi‐component health education programme probably results in little or no difference in uptake of 3 doses of hepatitis B vaccine compared to simplified health education. 17,411
 (1)c ⊕⊕⊕⊝
 Moderated
CI: confidence interval; RR: risk ratio.
*The anticipated absolute effect in the intervention group (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed likelihood of being vaccinated in the simplified health education group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
**GRADE Working Group grades of evidence:
High certainty: this research provides a very good indication of the likely effect. The likelihood that the effect will be substantially different is low.
Moderate certainty: this research provides a good indication of the likely effect. The likelihood that the effect will be substantially different is moderate.
Low certainty: this research provides some indication of the likely effect. However, the likelihood that it will be substantially different is high.
Very low certainty: this research does not provide a reliable indication of the likely effect. The likelihood that the effect will be substantially different is very high.
Substantially different = a large enough difference that it might affect a decision.

a Health education kit with 4‐lesson structured multi‐component intervention that included: a resource fact sheet and assessment, an information video and questions designed to engage an adolescent audience, small group discussion, and an activity to locate resource information on the Internet.

bThe lag‐time between delivery of the intervention and assessment of outcomes was not provided.

cSkinner 2000 (randomised trial).
 d Downgraded one level due to study limitations, as the included study has an unclear risk of bias.