Skinner 2000.
Methods | Randomised trial conducted in Australia | |
Participants |
Participants: school‐going girls and boys (class 7) Number per group: 458 students in intervention group and 467 students in control group Total number enrolled: 66 intervention schools (7588 students) AND 69 control schools (9823 students) aged 11–13 years Study population: Melbourne metropolitan secondary schools school‐going children in class 7 |
|
Interventions |
Intervention: complex hepatitis B education Description: health education kit with 4‐lesson structured multi‐component intervention that included:
The intervention group received the health educational in addition to the usual government student and parent information brochures. Duration: 1 year Comparison: simplified hepatitis B education Description of comparison: brochures were 1‐page folded coloured leaflets, outlining in simple terms, the risks of hepatitis B and benefits and adverse effects of vaccination. Vaccine target: hepatitis B vaccine Disease targeted: hepatitis B Number of doses: 3 doses |
|
Outcomes | Hepatitis B vaccine uptake Hepatitis B vaccine knowledge and attitude |
|
Notes | ||
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Random allocation to intervention and control was done. |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | No description. |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | The outcome is an objective measure. |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | The outcome is an objective measure. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | All schools recruited were included in the analysis on an intention‐to‐treat basis. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | No description. |
Other bias | Low risk | No evidence of other bias. |