Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 17;2020(1):CD011895. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011895.pub2

Skinner 2000.

Methods Randomised trial conducted in Australia
Participants Participants: school‐going girls and boys (class 7)
Number per group: 458 students in intervention group and 467 students in control group
Total number enrolled: 66 intervention schools (7588 students) AND 69 control schools (9823 students) aged 11–13 years
Study population: Melbourne metropolitan secondary schools school‐going children in class 7
Interventions Intervention: complex hepatitis B education
Description: health education kit with 4‐lesson structured multi‐component intervention that included:
  • resource fact sheet and assessment;

  • an information video and questions designed to engage an adolescent audience;

  • small group discussion;

  • an activity to locate resource information on the Internet.


The intervention group received the health educational in addition to the usual government student and parent information brochures.
Duration: 1 year
Comparison: simplified hepatitis B education
Description of comparison: brochures were 1‐page folded coloured leaflets, outlining in simple terms, the risks of hepatitis B and benefits and adverse effects of vaccination.
Vaccine target: hepatitis B vaccine
Disease targeted: hepatitis B
Number of doses: 3 doses
Outcomes Hepatitis B vaccine uptake
Hepatitis B vaccine knowledge and attitude
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Random allocation to intervention and control was done.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk No description.
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk The outcome is an objective measure.
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk The outcome is an objective measure.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk All schools recruited were included in the analysis on an intention‐to‐treat basis.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk No description.
Other bias Low risk No evidence of other bias.