Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 25;2020(1):CD012501. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012501.pub2

Puccetti 2001.

Methods 6‐week dietary period
6‐week before‐and‐after study
Participants 25 men and women with primary hypercholesterolaemia mean age 48.2 received cerivastatin
TC 6.93 mmol/L (268 mg/dL), HDL‐C 1.25 mmol/L (48.3 mg/dL) and TG 1.15 mmol/L (102 mg/dL)
Exclusion criteria: history of cardiovascular events or current hypertension, diabetes, or liver, renal, thyroid, infectious, immunological or malignant diseases. None of the participants had a personal or family history of deep vein thrombosis or a tendency to bleed, an none of them were taking hypolipidaemic, antiplatelet, anticoagulant or profibrinolytic drugs
Cerivastatin 0.2 mg/d baseline TC: 6.62 mmol/L (256 mg/dL)
 Cerivastatin 0.2 mg/d baseline LDL‐C: 4.89 mmol/L (189.1 mg/dL)
 Cerivastatin 0.2 mg/d baseline HDL‐C: 1.24 mmol/L (47.9 mg/dL)
Cerivastatin 0.2 mg/d baseline TG: 1.05 mmol/L (93 mg/dL)
Interventions Cerivastatin 0.2 mg/d
Atorvastatin 10 mg/d
Simvastatin 20 mg/d
Pravastatin 20 mg/d
Fluvastatin 20 mg/d
Outcomes Percentage change from baseline at 6 weeks of plasma TC, LDL‐C, HDL‐C and TG
Source of funding University of Siena
Notes Atorvastatin 10 mg/d, simvastatin 20 mg/d, pravastatin 20 mg/d and fluvastatin 20 mg/d data were not analysed.
SDs were imputed by the method of Furukawa 2006
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) High risk Controlled before‐and‐after design
Allocation concealment (selection bias) High risk Controlled before‐and‐after design
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Lipid parameter measurements unlikely influenced by lack of blinding
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 LDL‐C Low risk Lipid parameters were measured in a remote laboratory
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 WDAE High risk No comparison possible
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 Total cholesterol Low risk All participants were included in the efficacy analysis
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 LDL cholesterol Low risk All participants were included in the efficacy analysis
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 HDL cholesterol Low risk All participants were included in the efficacy analysis
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 Triglycerides Low risk All participants were included in the efficacy analysis
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk LDL‐C outcome was reported
Other bias Low risk Work funded by University of Siena