Skip to main content
. 2002 Jul 22;2002(3):CD003901. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003901

Rutten‐van Molken 1995.

Methods STUDY DESIGN: Parallel group‐single centre , Holland. 6 weeks. 
 RANDOMISATION: Yes, no method stated. 
 BLINDING: double blind, matching devices. 
 WITHDRAWALS/DROP OUTS: 13 described after randomization. 
 COMPLIANCE:. Not assessed 
 CONFOUNDERS: Groups well balanced by characteristics. Not ITT 
 QUALITY: Jadad 4. Cochrane B
Participants N = ENROLLED, 120 RANDOMISED. 107 COMPLETED ADULT , M = 60 F = 47 Mean age: 53 (SD 14) 
 BASELINE SEVERITY: Moderate asthma 
 INCLUSION : Baseline FEV1 50 to 70% predicted, > 15% FEV1 reversibility to SABA. 
 EXCLUSION: URTI/ LRTI < 6 WKS. OS, theophyllines, uncontrolled illness.
Interventions LONG ACTING BETA AGONIST: Salmeterol 50 mcg BD 
 SHORT ACTING BETA AGONIST: Salbutamol 400 mcg BD 
 PLACEBO: 
 DEVICE: Dry powder device‐ diskhaler. 
 TREATMENT PERIOD: 6 weeks 
 RESCUE: Salbutamol 400 mcg PRN 
 CO‐INTERVENTIONS: ICS 31%, cromones stable dose
Outcomes OUTCOMES: FEV1, FVC, PEF, Rescue use, asthma symptom score, efficacy score, AQOL/LWAQ scores, % days with no symptoms ,% nights with no asthma awakenings . 
 Eficacy rating
Notes Symptom Score‐ Night‐time 0 to 4(none ‐ so severe that no sleep possible). Day‐time 0 to 5 (no symptoms ‐ symptoms so severe normal activities not possible)
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Allocation concealment? Unclear risk Information not available (Cochrane Grade B)