Skip to main content
. 2002 Jul 22;2002(3):CD003901. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003901

Taylor 1998.

Methods STUDY DESIGN: 3 way cross over, 2 centre, New Zealand. 24 weeks. 
 RANDOMISATION: Yes, no method stated. 
 BLINDING: double blind, double dummy, matching devices. 
 WITHDRAWALS/DROP OUTS: 35 described after randomization and 8 protocol violators. 
 COMPLIANCE:. Assessed by counting blisters, > 87% 
 CONFOUNDERS: Not analysed by ITT, Efficacy analysis similar. 
 QUALITY: Jadad 4. Cochrane B
Participants N = ENROLLED, 165 RANDOMISED, 157 ANALYSED. ADULT , M = 73 F = 92 Mean age: 38 (range 18 to 64) 
 BASELINE SEVERITY: Mild‐moderate asthma 
 INCLUSION : > 15% FEV1 reversibility to SABA. PC20 methacholine < 8mg/ml. 
 EXCLUSION: current smokers, requiring OS or theophyllines, SABA requirement > 10 puffs/day, significant illness.
Interventions LONG ACTING BETA AGONIST: Salmeterol 50 mcg BD 
 SHORT ACTING BETA AGONIST: Salbutamol 400 mcg QDS 
 PLACEBO: placebo QDS 
 DEVICE: Dry powder device‐ diskhaler. 
 TREATMENT PERIOD: 24 weeks 
 RESCUE: Salbutamol 100 mcg PRN 
 CO‐INTERVENTIONS: None 8%, ICS 92%, cromones stable dose
Outcomes OUTCOMES: FEV1, FVC, PEF, Rescue use, exacerbations, daily asthma score.
Notes Exacerbations‐ Major = daily asthma score 3, PEF 40 to 60% predicted, requiring OS. 
 Minor‐ Daily asthma score 2, PEF 61 to 75% predicted, increased rescue use.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Allocation concealment? Unclear risk Information not available (Cochrane Grade B)