Baik 2015.
| Methods | Randomised clinical trial | |
| Participants | Country: South Korea Period of recruitment: 2011–2013 Number randomised: 65 Postrandomisation dropouts: not stated Revised sample size: 65 Mean age (years): not stated Females: not stated Presence of other features of decompensation (hepatorenal syndrome, hepatic encephalopathy, or variceal bleeding): not stated Ascites with low protein: not stated Primary prophylaxis: not stated Alcohol‐related cirrhosis: not stated Viral‐related cirrhosis: not stated Autoimmune disease‐related cirrhosis (e.g. PSC, PBC, AIH): not stated Other causes for cirrhosis: not stated Treated for ascites in addition to antibiotics (e.g. albumin or diuretics): not stated Inclusion criteria:
|
|
| Interventions | Participants randomly assigned to 2 groups. Group 1: rifaximin (n = 17) Further details: rifaximin 1200 mg/day for 3 months Group 2: no active intervention (n = 48) Further details: no treatment Additional details: both groups received propranolol |
|
| Outcomes | Outcomes reported: number of any adverse events per participant Follow‐up (months): 3 |
|
| Notes | Attempted to contact authors in November 2018, but received no replies | |
| Risk of bias | ||
| Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
| Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Comment: information not available |
| Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Comment: information not available |
| Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Comment: information not available |
| Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Comment: information not available |
| Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Comment: information not available |
| Selective reporting (reporting bias) | High risk | Comment: protocol not available, and authors did not report adverse events adequately. |
| Other bias | Low risk | Comment: no other bias noted |