Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 16;2020(1):CD013125. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013125.pub2

Baik 2015.

Methods Randomised clinical trial
Participants Country: South Korea
Period of recruitment: 2011–2013
Number randomised: 65
Postrandomisation dropouts: not stated
Revised sample size: 65
Mean age (years): not stated
Females: not stated
Presence of other features of decompensation (hepatorenal syndrome, hepatic encephalopathy, or variceal bleeding): not stated
Ascites with low protein: not stated
Primary prophylaxis: not stated
Alcohol‐related cirrhosis: not stated
Viral‐related cirrhosis: not stated
Autoimmune disease‐related cirrhosis (e.g. PSC, PBC, AIH): not stated
Other causes for cirrhosis: not stated
Treated for ascites in addition to antibiotics (e.g. albumin or diuretics): not stated
Inclusion criteria:
  • people with advanced cirrhosis (no further details on how advanced cirrhosis was defined)

Interventions Participants randomly assigned to 2 groups.
Group 1: rifaximin (n = 17)
Further details: rifaximin 1200 mg/day for 3 months
Group 2: no active intervention (n = 48)
Further details: no treatment
Additional details: both groups received propranolol
Outcomes Outcomes reported: number of any adverse events per participant
Follow‐up (months): 3
Notes Attempted to contact authors in November 2018, but received no replies
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Comment: information not available
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Comment: information not available
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Comment: information not available
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Comment: information not available
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Comment: information not available
Selective reporting (reporting bias) High risk Comment: protocol not available, and authors did not report adverse events adequately.
Other bias Low risk Comment: no other bias noted