Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 16;2020(1):CD013125. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013125.pub2

Trespi 1999.

Methods Randomised clinical trial
Participants Country: Italy
Period of recruitment: not stated
Number randomised: 52
Postrandomisation dropouts: not stated
Revised sample size: 52
Mean age (years): 63
Females: 11 (21.2%)
Presence of other features of decompensation (hepatorenal syndrome, hepatic encephalopathy, or variceal bleeding): not stated
Ascites with low protein: not stated
Primary prophylaxis: not stated
Alcohol‐related cirrhosis: 52 (100%)
Viral‐related cirrhosis: 0 (0%)
Autoimmune disease‐related cirrhosis (e.g. PSC, PBC, AIH): 0 (0%)
Other causes for cirrhosis: 0 (0%)
Treated for ascites in addition to antibiotics (e.g. albumin or diuretics): not stated
Inclusion criteria:
  • people with ascites and alcoholic cirrhosis

Interventions Participants randomly assigned to 2 groups.
Group 1: rifaximin (n = 27)
Further details: rifaximin 400 mg BD for 1 week/month (duration not stated, probably until the end of the follow‐up period)
Group 2: no active intervention (n = 25)
Further details: no treatment
Outcomes Outcomes reported: proportion with spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (as per definition)
Follow‐up (months): 12
Notes Attempted to contact authors in November 2018, but received no replies.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Comment: information not available
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Comment: information not available
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Comment: information not available
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Comment: information not available
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Comment: information not available
Selective reporting (reporting bias) High risk Comment: protocol not available, and authors did not report the outcomes assessed adequately.
Other bias Low risk Comment: no other bias noted