Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 16;2020(1):CD013125. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013125.pub2

Abdel Motelleb 2016.

Methods Randomised clinical trial
Participants Country: Egypt
Period of recruitment: not stated
Number randomised: 333
Postrandomisation dropouts: not stated
Revised sample size: 333
Mean age (years): not stated
Females: not stated
Presence of other features of decompensation (hepatorenal syndrome, hepatic encephalopathy, or variceal bleeding): 333 (100%)
Ascites with low protein: 333 (100%)
Primary prophylaxis: 333 (100%)
Alcohol‐related cirrhosis: not stated
Viral‐related cirrhosis: not stated
Autoimmune disease‐related cirrhosis (e.g. PSC, PBC, AIH): not stated
Other causes for cirrhosis: not stated
Treated for ascites in addition to antibiotics (e.g. albumin or diuretics): not stated
Interventions Participants randomly assigned to 3 groups.
Group 1: norfloxacin + rifaximin (n = not stated)
Further details: norfloxacin + rifaximin (no further details) for 6 months
Group 2: norfloxacin (n = not stated)
Further details: norfloxacin (no further details) for 6 months
Group 3: rifaximin (n = not stated)
Further details: rifaximin (no further details) for 6 months
No information on the number of participants in each group
Outcomes None of the outcomes of interest were reported.
Follow‐up (months): 6
Notes Attempted to contact authors in November 2018, but received no replies.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Comment: information not available
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Comment: information not available
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Quote: "Single‐blind."
Comment: further information not available
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Quote: "Single‐blind."
Comment: further information not available
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Comment: information not available
Selective reporting (reporting bias) High risk Comment: protocol not available, and authors did not report the outcomes assessed adequately.
Other bias Low risk Comment: no other bias noted