Bissonnette 2014.
Methods | Randomised, parallel‐arm trial Five centres in Canada (community centre clinics) Period of inclusion: March 2010 to August 2011 |
|
Participants |
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Baseline data: palmoplantar pustular psoriasis and palmoplantar pustulosis randomised 1:1 to ustekinumab 45 mg or 90 mg (based on weight) (15 participants) or placebo (18 participants). Total number of participants = 33
Withdrawal: 1 patient in the ustekinumab group discontinued treatment because of side effects, as did 3 in the placebo group (1 because of side effects and 2 for withdrawal of consent) |
|
Interventions |
Intervention A: ustekinumab 45 mg or 90 mg (based on weight) (15 participants) Control intervention B: placebo (18 participants) Co‐interventions: none Duration of treatment: 16 weeks |
|
Outcomes |
Primary outcome
Secondary outcome
|
|
Notes | Research funded and medication provided by Janssen Inc. Canada. Funders were involved in study design but not in data collection, manuscript preparation, or publication decisions Clinical trial: NCT01091051 |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Quote: "Palmoplantar pustular psoriasis and palmoplantar pustulosis patients were randomised (1:1) to receive either ustekinumab or placebo. The sponsor generated the non‐blocked random allocation sequences for each cohort using Excel (Microsoft, Richmond, WA, USA) and provided them to sites in sequentially numbered envelopes" Comment: probably done |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | Quote: "Palmoplantar pustular psoriasis and palmoplantar pustulosis patients were randomised (1:1) to receive either ustekinumab or placebo. The sponsor generated the non‐blocked random allocation sequences for each cohort using Excel (Microsoft, Richmond, WA, USA) and provided them to sites in sequentially numbered envelopes" Comment: probably done |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Quote: "Patients were randomised to receive ustekinumab or placebo. Patients randomised to placebo received an equal volume injection of bacteriostatic sodium chloride at day 0 and week 4 followed by ustekinumab at weeks 16 and 20. The un‐blinded pharmacist who had access to the randomisation codes was the only person knowing the nature of the treatment dispensed to patients" Comment: participants were blind but the pharmacist was not |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Quote: "Patients were randomised to receive ustekinumab or placebo. Patients randomised to placebo received an equal volume injection of bacteriostatic sodium chloride at day 0 and week 4 followed by ustekinumab at weeks 16 and 20. The un‐blinded pharmacist who had access to the randomisation codes was the only person knowing the nature of the treatment dispensed to patients" Comment: the pharmacist was the only person knowing the nature of the treatment delivered |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Comment: one participant in the ustekinumab group discontinued treatment because of side effects as did 3 in the placebo group (1 because of side effects and 2 for withdrawal of consent). All participants were included in the 'intention‐to‐treat' population and in the safety population |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | High risk | Comment: the study protocol is available but not all of the study’s pre‐specified secondary outcomes (PPPASI‐75 at week 16) have been reported in the pre‐specified way |