Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 20;2020(1):CD011628. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011628.pub2

Ward 1976.

Methods Cross‐over trial
Three centres in London
Period of inclusion: February 1973 to May 1974
Participants Inclusion criteria
  • Chronic, recurring, sterile pustulation with characteristic cyclical changes in the pustules (> 2 mm in diameter) from yellow to brown, followed by shedding of the dry scale

  • Has not taken tetracycline within the previous 3 months


Exclusion criteria
  • During the preceding 2 months, disease consisted only of scaling, erythema, and/or tiny vesicles or brown macules < 2 mm in diameter

  • Pregnancy

  • Contraindication to tetracycline


Participants were seen by an observer at intervals of 6 weeks
Baseline data: clomocycline 170 mg thrice daily vs placebo (n = 60)
  • Mean age, years: 52.4 ± 12.3 for women; 45.6 ± 13.8 for men

  • Male/female: 12/48

  • Proportion of participants with psoriatic lesions elsewhere: not specified


Withdrawal: 6 participants did not attend (4 after the first visit), 14 discontinued because of side effects (1 was on placebo and complained of heartburn and 13 were on clomocycline and complained of nausea and vomiting (6), vaginal thrush (1), constipation (1), heartburn (1), and miscellaneous symptoms (4))
Interventions Intervention 1
A: clomocycline 170 mg thrice daily for 2 weeks, then twice a day for 10 weeks (60 participants; cross‐over design)
Intervention 2
B: placebo (60 participants, cross‐over design)
Co‐interventions: ointment or dilute Betnovate in petrolatum
Duration of treatment: 3 months
Outcomes No primary or secondary outcome pre‐specified
  • Response (according to a diagram based on numbers of pustules and brown macules and extent of disease)

Notes Funding: not reported
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Quote: "Each patient received 3 months each of clomocycline and placebo in random order"
Comment: insufficient information about the sequence generation process to permit judgement
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Comment: no information on method to guarantee allocation concealment
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Quote: "The paired packs were randomly labelled A and B using a restricted randomisation in tens, so that when treatment was started with pack A neither investigator nor patient knew whether it contained clomocycline or placebo"
Comment: probably done
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Quote: "The paired packs were randomly labelled A and B using a restricted randomisation in tens, so that when treatment was started with pack A neither investigator nor patient knew whether it contained clomocycline or placebo"
Comment: probably done
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Quote: "Of sixty patients entering the trial twenty failed to complete the treatment. Six patients did not attend, four after the first visit. The remaining fourteen discontinued with side effects: one of these was on placebo and complained of heartburn; while the thirteen on clomocycline complained of nausea and vomiting (6), vaginal thrush (1), constipation (1), heartburn (1), miscellaneous symptoms (4)"
Comment: 20 dropouts and no ITT analysis
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Comment: no protocol found to guarantee that all planned outcomes are presented in the results