Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 20;2020(1):CD011628. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011628.pub2
Study Reason for exclusion
Aso K 1983 Not an RCT
Carr 2008 Not an RCT
Cassano 2010 All included patients had palmoplantar psoriasis ‐ not palmoplantar pustulosis
Dupre 1973 Not an RCT
Duweb 2001 All cases concerned patients with palmoplantar psoriasis ‐ not palmoplantar pustulosis
Engin 2005 Only 4 of the included patients had palmoplantar pustulosis (and results are not specified clearly for them); the others had other types of palmoplantar dermatosis
Fritsch 1978 Not an RCT
Gjertsen 1980 Not an RCT
Grundmann‐Kollmann 1999 None of the selected patients had palmoplantar pustulosis
Gupta 2011 Not an RCT
Hofer 2006 Only 5 out of 8 participants had palmoplantar pustulosis and 3 had hyperkeratotic plaque psoriasis with no differentiation in results between the 2 subgroups
Janagond 2013 None of the selected patients had palmoplantar pustulosis
Khandpur 2011 All included patients had palmoplantar psoriasis, with no mention of the presence of pustulosis
Kumar 1997 All included patients had plaque‐type ‐ not pustular ‐ palmar and/or plantar psoriasis
Mehta 2011 All included patients had plaque‐type palmar and/or plantar psoriasis, and patients with palmoplantar pustulosis were excluded
Neumann 2006 None of the selected patients had palmoplantar pustulosis
Orfanos 1978 Trial includes different types of psoriasis
Papp 2012 All included patients had plaque psoriasis of palms, soles, and scalp, but not palmoplantar pustulosis
Rosen 1988 Study of epidermal Langerhans cells on skin biopsies
Schiener 2005 None of the selected patients had palmoplantar pustulosis
Sezer 2007 None of the selected patients had palmoplantar pustulosis (palmoplantar psoriasis ‐ no pustulosis described in inclusion criteria or patient description at baseline)
Thaci 2010 All patients had plaque‐type psoriasis, which may have involved palms or soles
Yaniv 2012 Not a randomised controlled trial
Zhang Jun 2007 Not an RCT

RCT: randomised controlled trial.