Skip to main content
. 2012 May 16;2012(5):CD005257. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005257.pub3

Malone 1991.

Methods Randomised, open controlled study
 I. Blinding of randomisations ‐ can't tell
 II. Blinding of intervention ‐ no
 III. Blinding of outcome measure assessment ‐ no
 IV. Complete follow‐up‐ yes
Participants 12 infants born at </= 28 weeks GA with hyperkalaemia defined as central non haemolyzed serum K+ of > 7 mmol/L
 Urine output (ml/kg/hr) was not reported
 Study period May 1, 1989, and December 31, 1989
 Single centre, the US
Interventions 7 infants [mean (SD) GA 24.8 +/‐ 1.5 weeks, BW 780 +/‐ 160 g ] received glucose‐insulin (human insulin with 5% albumin). The insulin was "piggybacked" into the existing i.v. fluids by means of a syringe infusion pump, starting at a rate of 0.1 ml/hr to deliver a dose of 0.05 to 0.1 IU/kg/hr
 5 infants [mean (SD) GA 23.8 +/‐ 0.8 weeks, BW 650 +/‐ 60 g] received sodium polystyrene sulphonate (Kayexalate) prepared in a 25% sorbitol solution and given rectally in a dose of 1 gm/kg every 6 hours
Outcomes Mortality, treatment failure (increase in K+ concentration > 0.5 mmol/L or failure to decrease K+ to < 7mmol/L, cardiac arrhythmia, hypoglycaemia (< 40 mg/dl; 2.2 mmol/L)
Notes In 4 of the 5 Kayexalate‐treated infants in whom treatment was considered to have failed, a glucose‐insulin therapy was added. All 4 responded with decreased central K+ concentration within 6 hours after glucose‐insulin was added
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Randomised, open controlled study
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Blinding of randomisations ‐ can't tell
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Blinding of intervention ‐ no
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Blinding of intervention ‐ no
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Blinding of outcome measure assessment ‐ no
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Complete follow‐up ‐ yes