Table 2. Effects of the cross-modal modulation on the laminar BOLD response and decoding accuracy profiles in auditory areas.
| A) BOLD profile | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| linear or constant | constant | linear | ||||||
| [AV - A]Att_A, Att_V | mean(A1, PT) | F(2,40) = 0.196 | p=0.823 | |||||
| B) Decoding profile | ||||||||
| linear or constant | constant | linear | ||||||
| [AV VS A]att A, att V | mean(A1, PT) | F(2,40) = 34.946 | p<0.001 | F(1,20) = 21.966 | p<0.001 | F(1,20) = 1.850 | p=0.189 | |
| A1 | t(10)=3.867 | p=0.003 | ||||||
| PT | t(10)=4.992 | p<0.001 | ||||||
Using 2 (shape parameter: constant, linear) x 2 (ROI: primary, non-primary) linear mixed effects models, we performed the following statistical comparisons in a 'step down procedure':.
1. Two-dimensional F-test assessing whether the constant or linear parameter (e.g. each averaged across ROIs in auditory resp. visual cortices), was significantly different from zero (dark grey),.
2. If this two-dimensional F-test was significant, we computed one dimensional F-tests separately for the constant and the linear parameters (again averaged across auditory resp. visual ROIs) (light grey),.
3. If the one dimensional F-test was significant, we computed follow-up t-tests separately for each of the two ROIs (white).