Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 20;16(4):1183–1197. doi: 10.1007/s13311-019-00774-9

Table 4.

Metric comparison between different phases of CAP (Plans 2–4)

Metric Estimate (95% confidence interval) p value*
Plan 2 Plan 3 Plan 4
Length (mm) 43.65 (39.39, 47.92) 44.41 (40.15, 48.68) 43.16 (38.90, 47.44) 0.772
Drilling angle (deg.) 18.85 (16.53, 21.18) 19.36 (17.04, 21.68) 18.84 (16.52, 21.16) 0.885
GM sampling ratio 0.37 (0.30, 0.45) 0.39 (0.31, 0.46) 0.37 (0.30, 0.45) 0.704
Risk score 0.90 (0.84, 0.96) 0.96 (0.90, 1.02) 1.01 (0.95, 1.07) 0.00023
Minimum distance from critical structure (mm) 2.76 (2.45, 3.07) 2.36 (2.05, 2.67) 2.23 (1.92, 2.54) 0.001

Estimates for each metric by group from mixed-effects ANOVA models that include patient-level random effects to account for within-patient clustering of electrodes. *p values are shown for likelihood ratio tests of the null hypothesis of no difference in the corresponding outcome variable between plans 2 and 4