Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 27;10:1231. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-58033-3

Table 2.

Differences in incidence rates of diagnoses of non-diabetic hyperglycaemia and type 2 diabetes by general practices’ coverage of the NHS Health Check Programme and patients’ baseline diabetes risk score.

Incidence Rate Total Sample DRS ≥ 10
HR 95% CI HR 95% CI
Non-Diabetic Hyperglycaemia
Programme Coverage§
Low 0.19 per 1000 person-years (N = 2,096) ref ref
Medium 0.25 per 1000 person-years (N = 2,693) 1.15*** 1.08 1.22 1.15** 1.04 1.27
High 0.29 per 1000 person-years (N = 2,337) 1.19*** 1.11 1.27 1.23*** 1.11 1.37
Type 2 Diabetes Crude Rates HR 95% CI HR 95% CI
Programme Coverage§
Low 0.35 per 1000 person-years (N = 4,018) ref ref
Medium 0.42 per 1000 person-years (N = 4,482) 1.10*** 1.05 1.15 1.13** 1.05 1.21
High 0.45 per 1000 person-years (N = 3,671) 1.09*** 1.03 1.14 1.10* 1.02 1.19

Time period was Jan 2009-May 2016. Results are shown from multivariable Cox regression models. All models have been adjusted for the baseline values of the following independent variables: age, gender, ethnicity, smoking status, body mass index, antihypertensive medication, general practice deprivation score, and region. Models have also been adjusted for propensity score based on patients’ probability of being registered with a practice with low, medium or high coverage of the Health Check Programme. Abbreviations: DRS = diabetes risk score, HR = Hazard ratio. Legends: *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, §Tertiles of general practices coverage of the NHS Health Check Programme were defined based on programme coverage during the first three years after its implementation (2009–11).