Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 20;133(2):457–477. doi: 10.1007/s00122-019-03476-0

Table 4.

Locations and estimates of QTL for plant height (cm) on the consensus map, including chromosomes 2B, 3B, 5A, 5R, 7A, and using a parental model run on all the lines from the three mapping populations with the mppR package

Chr Closest marker %PVa LODb Posc Ranged Parent Effect T teste
5R Xiac129 53.3 36.0 79.4 7.9 Tulus − 0.5 n.s
F1(Agos´xGren´) − 14.1 ***
ElPaso 0.1 n.s
5A 3622789|F|0-8:G > A-8:G > A 1.9 3.3 71.9 66.5 Tulus 0.2 n.s
F1(Agos´xGren´) − 1.7 n.s
ElPaso 5.4 ***
5A 4211970|F|0-17:G > C-17:G > C 1.4 4.4 106.3 29.6 Tulus − 1.9 *
F1(Agos´xGren´) − 0.9 n.s
ElPaso − 2.1 **
5A 3619312|F|0-12:G > C-12:G > C 3.0 5.5 164.2 6.9 Tulus − 1.6 .
F1(Agos´xGren´) − 3.6 ***
ElPaso − 0.9 n.s

aPercentage of phenotypic variance explained by the QTL

bLOD (logarithm of the odds) above LOD threshold at the 0.05 level of probability obtained through a 1000-iteration permutation test

cBest estimated position for the QTL in cM on the consensus Map

dRange of the confidence interval position for the QTL

eStudent’s T tests results indicating when the tested parental effect is significantly different from the effect of the shared parent

p < 0.10

* p < 0.05

** p < 0.01

*** p < 0.001

n.s. nonsignificant