. 2020 Jan 20;133(2):457–477. doi: 10.1007/s00122-019-03476-0

Table 6.

Locations and estimates of QTL for AUDPC on the consensus map, including chromosomes 2B, 3B, 5A, 5R, 7A, and using bi-allelic and parental models run on all the lines from the three mapping populations with the mppR package

Chr	Model	Closest marker	%PV^a	LOD^b	Pos^c	Range^d	Parent	Effect	T test^e
2B	Parental	10517361\|F\|0-33:T > C-33:T > C	9.4	6.6	144	14.1	Tulus	38.6	***
							F1(Agos´xGren´)	− 13.2	n.s
							ElPaso	− 29.5	**
	Bi-allelic	11911490\|F\|0-41:G > T-41:G > T	10.5	6.9	149.7	1.3	Tulus	39.9	***
							F1(Agos´xGren´)	0.0	n.s
							ElPaso	0.0	n.s
3B	Parental	10524243\|F\|0-32:G > A-32:G > A	14.7	8.9	59.7	15.5	Tulus	44.8	***
							F1(Agos´xGren´)	30.9	***
							ElPaso	22.4	**
	Bi-allelic	14479870\|F\|0-26:A > T-26:A > T	9.7	7.6	67.4	20.9	Tulus	28.6	***
							F1(Agos´xGren´)	28.6	***
							ElPaso	28.6	***
5R	Parental	Xiac129	8.1	6.3	79.4	11.3	Tulus	5.3	n.s
							F1(Agos´xGren´)	52.8	***
							ElPaso	14.0	.
	Bi-allelic	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–

^aPercentage of phenotypic variance explained by the QTL

^bLOD (logarithm of the odds) above LOD threshold at the 0.05 level of probability obtained through a 1000-iteration permutation test

^cBest estimated position for the QTL in cM on the consensus Map

^dRange of the confidence interval position for the QTL

^eStudent’s T tests results indicating when the tested parental effect is significantly different from the effect of the shared parent

p < 0.10

* p < 0.05

** p < 0.01

*** p < 0.001

n.s. nonsignificant