Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 8;3(1):e1–e9. doi: 10.1093/jcag/gwz035

Table 2.

CT-P13 compared to infliximab originator for active Crohn’s disease naive to anti-TNF therapy: summary of findings table

Certainty assessment No. of patients Effect Certainty Importance
No. of studies Study design Risk of bias Inconsistency Indirectness Imprecision Other considerations CT-P13 infliximab originator Relative (95% CI) Absolute (95% CI)
Crohn’s disease remission (follow up: mean 6 weeks; assessed with: A reduction of CDAI > 70 points)
1 Randomised trials Not serious Not serious Not serious Very serious a None 77/111 (69.4%) 81/109 (74.3%) RR 0.96 (0.76–1.22) 30 fewer per 1,000 (from 178 fewer to 163 more) ⨁⨁◯◯ LOW CRITICAL
Switch to another biologic (follow up: mean 12 months; assessed with: Switch of drug in administrative database)
1 Observational studies Very serious b Not serious Not serious Not serious None 312/2499 (12.5%) 406/2551 (15.9%) HR 0.93 (0.79–1.08) 10 fewer per 1,000 (from 31 fewer to 12 more) ⨁⨁◯◯ LOW CRITICAL
Serious infections (follow up: mean 12 months; assessed with: Administrative database)
1 Observational studies Serious b Not serious Not serious Serious c None 83/2499 (3.3%) 115/2551 (4.5%) HR 0.82 (0.61–1.11) 8 fewer per 1,000 (from 17 fewer to 5 more) ⨁⨁◯◯ LOW CRITICAL

CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio explanations; RR, risk ratio.

aPossibility that CT-P13 is up to 15% less effective than infliximab originator. This was felt to be an important difference when substituting one drug for a similar drug.

bDecision to use CT-P13 was up to patient and clinician.

c95% CI include important differences in safety.