Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 21;10:3022. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.03022

TABLE 3.

Comparison between behavioral addictions and SF-12 dimensions.

SF-12 PCS Statistics p ESb SF-12 MCS Statistics p ESb
YFAS 2.0a Negative 52.5 (6.4) t = 3.246 0.001 d = 0.34 43.2 (10.8) t = 7.823 <0.001 d = 0.87
Positive 50.1 (7.5) 33.8 (10.9)
SOGSa Negative 52.3 (6.4) t = 0.960 0.337 42.3 (11.1) t = −1.098 0.272
Positive 51.6 (7.7) 43.8 (10.1)
IATa Negative 52.5 (6.3) t = 2.597 0.010 d = 0.21 43.1 (11.0) t = 4.859 <0.001 d = 0.39
Positive 51.1 (7.2) 38.8 (10.8)
BA comorbidity Negative 52.7 (6.2) F = 7.023 0.001 η2 = 0.013 43.9 (10.7) F = 27.504 <0.001 η2 = 0.049
Positive 1 BA 51.6 (6.9) 38.1 (11.2)
Positive >1 BA 49.6 (8.2) 37.7 (11.3)

aResults are presented as means (SD). bOnly effect sizes of significant differences are displayed. SF-12 PCS, Short Form-12 Health Survey Physical Component Summary; SF-12 MCS, Short Form-12 Health Survey Mental Component Summary; YFAS 2.0, Yale Food Addiction Scale 2.0; SOGS, South Oaks Gambling Screen; IAT, Internet Addiction Test; ES, Effect size; BA, Behavioral Addiction.