Skip to main content
. 2019 Oct 16;318(1):L112–L124. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.00206.2019

Table 1.

Effect of ERβ signaling on histamine-induced [Ca2+]i response through L-type calcium channel inhibition

Treatment Groups AUC ± SE (−Nifedipine) AUC ± SE (+Nifedipine)
Vehicle 5,150.18 ± 127.83 3,268.98 ± 175.17*
WAY 4,798.59 ± 225.98 2,804.56 ± 340.72*
TNF-α 9,684.00 ± 315.96 7,780.38 ± 37.45#
WAY + TNF-α 5,039.17 ± 210.63 2,522.55 ± 211.08§
IL-13 9,131.13 ± 250.73 7,392.80 ± 213.06#
WAY + IL-13 5303.31 ± 163.01 2734.72 ± 190.93§

Data are presented as means ± SE; n = 7 patients. Human nonasthmatic airway smooth muscle (ASM) cells exposed to TNF-α or IL-13 in the presence of WAY, were subjected to intracellular Ca2+ ([Ca2+]i) response to histamine, and comparisons of their area under the curve (AUC) were obtained with blunting effect of L-type calcium channel (LTCC) inhibitor nifedipine (1 µM, 20 min).

*

P ≤ 0.05, vs. vehicle or WAY (nifedipine effect),

#

P < 0.001 vs. respective cytokines (nifedipine effect).

P < 0.001 vs. WAY + cytokines (nifedipine effect).

§

P < 0.001 vs. cytokines + nifedipine (WAY effect).

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure