Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 28;20:26. doi: 10.1186/s12877-020-1429-z

Table 2.

Comparisons of characteristics based on oral health

Variables OHAT 0(n = 213) OHAT 1–2(n = 206) OHAT ≥ 3(n = 205) p value
Age, years, mean ± SD 83.1 ± 8.0 83.1 ± 8.0 85.2 ± 7.6 0.007†‡
Male, n (%) 78 (36.6) 87 (42.2) 89 (43.4) 0.317
BMI, kg/m2, mean ± SD 20.6 ± 3.8 20.6 ± 3.9 20.0 ± 3.5 0.130
Nutrition
 Normal nutritional status (MNA-SF > 11), n (%) 69 (32.4) 55 (26.7) 30 (14.6) < 0.001†‡
 At risk (8–11), n (%) 94 (44.1) 87 (42.2) 85 (41.5)
 Malnutrition (<  8), n (%) 50 (23.5) 64 (31.1) 90 (43.9)
 Barthel Index, score, median [IQR] 90 [40–100] 65 [31.25–100] 45 [10–75] < 0.001*†‡
 CPS, score, median [IQR] 1 [0–3] 2 [0–4] 3 [2–5] < 0.001*†‡
 CCI, score, median [IQR] 3 [1–5] 3 [1–4] 3 [2–5] 0.021‡
Reason for admission < 0.001*†
 Infections, n (%) 44 (20.7) 62 (30.1) 73 (35.6)
 Rehabilitation, n (%) 24 (11.3) 30 (14.6) 35 (17.1)
 Malignancy, n (%) 43 (20.2) 23 (11.2) 20 (9.8)
 Nutrition support, n (%) 20 (9.4) 28 (13.6) 34 (16.6)
 Gastroenterological disorders, n (%) 23 (10.8) 28 (13.6) 16 (7.8)
 Cardiovascular diseases, n (%) 6 (2.8) 8 (3.9) 8 (3.9)
 Surgery, n (%) 15 (7.0) 5 (2.4) 1 (0.5)
 Renal diseases, n (%) 3 (1.4) 1 (0.5) 1 (0.5)
 Others, n (%) 35 (16.4) 21 (10.2) 17 (8.3)

*: p <  0.05, OHAT 0 group vs OHAT 1–2 group using post-hoc Bonferroni correction

†: p <  0.05, OHAT 0 group vs OHAT ≥3 group using post-hoc Bonferroni correction

‡: p < 0.05, OHAT 1–2 group vs OHAT ≥3 group using post-hoc Bonferroni correction

Abbreviations: SD, standard deviation; BMI, body mass index; MNA-SF, mini nutritional assessment short form; IQR, interquartile range; CPS, cognitive performance scale; CCI, Charlson Comorbidity Index; OHAT, oral health assessment tool